check
Dickens, Natural History, and Our Mutual Friend | Partial Answers

Filter By Topic

Filter By Subject

Filter By Volumes

Filter by Years

  •  
  • 1 of 3
  • »

Dickens, Natural History, and Our Mutual Friend

Date Published:

11 June, 2011

Abstract:

The paper argues that, well aware of the developments in contemporary science, including biology and political economy, Dickens believed in the significance of the scientific paradigm shifts for ordinary human life. Dickens's early fiction constituted, among other things, a passionate critique of para-Malthusian political economy. This critique is resumed in Our Mutual Friend, yet with the new awareness of the shift of dominant paradigms from political economy to Darwinist biological thinking. Whereas the legislature that grew out of political economy could be challenged and modified, Darwin's account of natural selection, a biological theory that had permanent ontological ramifications, had a claim to the stability of a natural law which disabled beliefs in Providential design. Darwin's work, however, did not deny the potential of benevolent sympathetic human agency. Dickens's novel pits such agency against the blind forces of the struggle for survival, even while subverting the confidence in overall ethical design trailed in by the residual elements of the traditional melodrama.

 

Sally Ledger (1961–2009), of Royal Holloway, University of London, and, formerly, of Birkbeck (where she co-founded Center for Nineteenth Century Studies), is the author of innovative studies of Victorian literature and culture, including The New Woman: Fiction and Feminism at the Fin de Siècle (Manchester University Press, 1997) and Dickens and the Popular Radical Imagination (Cambridge University Press, 2007).

 

Publisher's Version

Last updated on 04/16/2020