Filter By Topic

Filter By Subject

Filter By Volumes

Filter by Years

Publications

2019
Erll, Astrid . 2019. Homer, Turko, Little Harry: Cultural Memory and the Ethics of Premediation in James Joyce’s Ulysses. 17(2): 227-253. . Publisher's Version

This article addresses narrative ethics from a media and memory studies perspective. It discusses the ethics of premediation in James Joyce’s Ulysses. Premediation is a forward-facing, generative dynamic of cultural memory: the medial preformation of imagination, experience, storytelling, and action. I first explore Ulysses’s mimesis of premediation, showing how in the Calypso episode, Bloom’s imagination is premediated by Orientalist stereotypes, and how in the Ithaca episode, Stephen’s ballad of Little Harry Hughes exposes the premediating power of age-old anti-Semitic narratives. Both episodes reveal the ethically problematic dimension of premediating schemata, which often operate non-consciously. But they also hint at the possibility of critical reflection, of “turning around upon one’s schemata” in the psychologist Frederic Bartlett’s sense. In a second step, I discuss the novel’s references to the Odyssey as a case of premediation, showing how new concepts of memory and mediation can elucidate this famous case of intertextuality. I argue that the particular presence of Homer in Ulysses — not as remediation, but as premediation — marks modernism’s new temporal regime, where tradition is used to tell new stories and thus turns into a future-oriented and enabling resource. Discussing the dynamic of premediation both on the level of narrative representation and in the novel’s intertextual relations, this article explores the potentials of a memory studies concept for the fields of (ethical) narratology, Joyce studies, and classical reception studies.

 

 

May 2019: Astrid Erll is Professor of Anglophone Literatures and Cultures at Goethe-University Frankfurt (Germany) and founder of the Frankfurt Memory Studies Platform (FMSP). Her research fields include memory studies, narratology, media studies, and transcultural studies. Erll is general editor of the book series Media and Cultural Memory (with A. Nünning, de Gruyter) and author of Memory in Culture (Palgrave, 2011). Recent publications are Audiovisual Memory and the (Re)Making of Europe (Image & Narrative 2017, ed. with A. Rigney) and Cultural Memory after the Transnational Turn (Memory Studies 2018, ed.with A. Rigney). In her current research project, she studies the afterlives of the Odyssey.

 

 

astrid_erll.jpg
Phelan, James . 2019. Jakob Lothe: An Appreciation. 17(2): 201-208. . Publisher's VersionAbstract

Writing in the genre of “Letter to an old friend,” James Phelan offers an appreciation of the deep interconnections between the character and the scholarship of Jakob Lothe, to whom this issue of the journal is dedicated. Phelan contrasts T. S. Eliot’s dictum about the desirable separation between the “man who suffers and the mind which creates” with his own experience of Lothe. Phelan finds that in Lothe the man who suffers is inseparable from the mind that interprets and theorizes and that this continuity between “man” and “mind” contributes to the superior quality of each.

 

 

May 2019: James Phelan is Distinguished University Professor at Ohio State University. His research has been devoted to developing a viable account of narrative as rhetoric. He has written about style in Worlds from Words; about character and narrative progression in Reading People, Reading Plots; about voice, character narration, ethics, and audiences in Narrative as Rhetoric; about the rhetoric and ethics of character narration in Living to Tell about It; and about narrative judgments and progression in Experiencing Fiction.  He has taken up the relationship between literary history and rhetorical analysis in Reading the American Novel, 1920-2010 (2013), and he has further extended the conception and consequences of his rhetorical approach in Somebody Telling Somebody Else: A Rhetorical Poetics of Narrative (2017).  In 2020, he and Matthew Clark will publish Debating Rhetorical Narratology: On the Synthetic, Mimetic, and Thematic Aspects of Narrative. He has also engaged in direct scholarly give-and-take in Narrative Theory: Core Concepts and Critical Debates co-authored with David Herman, Peter J. Rabinowitz, Brian Richardson, and Robyn Warhol (2012). In 1991, Phelan brought out the autobiographical journal Beyond the Tenure Track: Fifteen Months in the Life of an English Professor

In addition to publishing well over 100 essays, Phelan has edited or co-edited seven collections of essays, including the Blackwell Companion to Narrative Theory (with Peter J. Rabinowitz, 2005), Teaching Narrative Theory (with David Herman and Brian McHale), and After Testimony: The Ethics and Aesthetics of Holocaust Narrative for the Future (with Susan R. Suleiman and Jakob Lothe, 2012).  With Gerald Graff, he has edited two textbooks for the classroom, Adventures of Huckleberry Finn: A Case Study in Critical Controversy (1995, 2004), and The Tempest: A Case Study in Critical Controversy (2000, 2009)

Since 1992, Phelan has been the editor of Narrative, the journal of the Society for the Study of Narrative Literature. Since 1993, he has been co-editor, with Peter J. Rabinowitz (1993-2018), Robyn Warhol (2012-2016), and Katra Byram (2017--), of the Ohio State University Press series on the Theory and Interpretation of Narrative.

June 2006: Born in Flushing, NY, James Phelan received his BA from Boston College (1972) and his MA and Ph.D. from the University of Chicago (1977). He began as an Assistant Professor at Ohio State in 1977, was promoted to Associate Professor in 1983 and to Professor in 1989. He served as Department Chair from 1994-2002; in 2004 he was awarded the University's Distinguished Scholar Award. Phelan's work focuses on theoretical issues or problems in narrative. He has written about style in Worlds from Words; about character and narrative progression in Reading People, Reading Plots; about voice, character narration, ethics, and audiences in Narrative as Rhetoric; and about the rhetoric and ethics of character narration in Living to Tell about It.  He has also published the autobiographical journal Beyond the Tenure Track and has edited, with Peter J. Rabinowitz, Understanding Narrative, and, with Gerald Graff, Adventures of Huckleberry Finn: A Case Study in Critical Controversy, and The Tempest: A Case Study in Critical Controversy.

            Since 1992, Phelan has been the editor of Narrative, the journal of the Society for the Study of Narrative Literature and winner of the 1993 CELJ Award for Best New Journal. Since 1993, he has been co-editor, with Peter J. Rabinowitz, of the Ohio State University Press series on the Theory and Interpretation of Narrative.

 

Toker, Leona, and Jeremy Hawthorn. 2019. LITERATURE AS TIME'S WITNESS: SPECIAL ISSUE IN HONOR OF JAKOB LOTHE. INTRODUCTION. 17(2): 125-200. . Publisher's VersionAbstract

After decades of research writing, literary critics are often moved to write not “about” literature but “the real thing” — poems, fiction, or memoirs. Jacob Lothe of Oslo University, author of four books and editor or coeditor of several collections of collaborative literary research, was moved to collect oral testimony about the Holocaust. In 2006, with Anette Storeide, he published narratives by concentration-camp survivors — Tidsvitner: Fortellinger fra Auschwitz og Sachsenhausen (Time’s Witnesses: Narratives from Auschwitz and Sachsenhausen). This book records the ordeals and survival of eight men who were victims of the Nazi concentration camps of Auschwitz and Sachsenhausen, as told by themselves. It was followed in 2013 by Lothe’s collection of narratives by ten women who survived concentration-camp incarceration, translated into English as Time’s Witnesses: Women’s Voices from the Holocaust (2017). The title of the present special issue, Literature as Time’s Witness, salutes these two books while responding to a large part of Jakob Lothe’s research interests, including his concern with the ethics of narrative. The articles collected in this issue in his honor do not advocate reading literary works as documents of historical periods but recognize the multifunctionality of literary works and discuss the relationship between the art and the attesting potentialities of fiction and poetry in addition to factographic writing.

Koppen, Randi . 2019. The Work of the Witness: Leonard Woolf, Imperialism, and Totalitarianism. 17(2): 209-226. . Publisher's Version

 

 

 

Starting from an interest in witnessing as a set of conceptual and narrative operations that also involve comparison as a fundamental cognitive practice, this essay examines the work of the witness at two historically entangled moments. In the “multi-directional memory” (Rothberg) of the British Jewish writer and political activist Leonard Woolf early 20th-century colonial trauma connects with the rise in racial persecution and absolute power in Europe of the 1930s. Woolf’s experience as a colonial administrator in Ceylon is given fictional form in his 1913 novel The Village in the Jungle; an analysis of the condition of colonialism that is enabled by his complex and contingent position as a witness. Strikingly, the novel’s comparative operations and conceptual tropes reappear in his historiography of “the origins of totalitarianism” in Barbarians at the Gate (1939). For Woolf, the extreme events of the 1930s spur an almost compulsive historicism that leads back to the history of European imperialism and to his own colonial encounter, bringing together different temporal and spatial coordinates in a manner that is at once prescient and familiar. Not only is this an anticipation of Hannah Arendt’s famous “boomerang thesis” in The Origins of Totalitarianism (1951); more generally Woolf’s narrative offers a historical perspective on recent transnational and global approaches to comparison where network- or other horizontal and lateral models dominate and where connections among coordinates can only appear tentative and fractured. Like Arendt’s, Woolf’s grand narrative was composed with the urgency of the witness to extreme events, illuminating the potential, as well as the risks, of cross-temporal comparison.

 

 

May 2019: Randi Koppen, professor of British Literature at the University of Bergen, has published on various aspects of modernist literature and culture, including fashion and body culture, popular science, sound technologies and broadcasting. Her work has appeared in leading journals such as New Literary History and Modern Drama, and with international publishers such as Edinburgh University Press and Bloomsbury Academic. Her book Virginia Woolf, Fashion and Literary Modernity (Edinburgh University Press, 2009), explores the modern fascination with clothes as objects, signs, things, and embodied practice, demonstrating how Woolf’s work provides illuminating examples of all of these aspects. Professor Koppen’s current research centres on the interwar writing and activism of Leonard Woolf, especially its advancement of international collaboration, solidarity and justice.

 

Wolloch, Nathaniel . 2019. Edward Gibbon’s Autobiographies and the Historicist Critique of Enlightenment Historiography. Partial Answers 17(1): 1-22. . Publisher's Version

This article examines the manner in which Edward Gibbon attempted to mould his public image for posterity, while writing and rewriting the various versions of his autobiography. It highlights Gibbon’s attempts to anticipate the critical reading of his memoirs and fashion his public image, not least regarding his attitude toward religion. It also discusses, in this context, his views on the proper manner of writing history, and how they developed throughout his intellectual career, specifically in relation to his great historical work, The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire. This assessment of Gibbon is then used to criticize the “historicist” critique of Enlightenment historiography, which has blamed Gibbon and other Enlightenment historians for being improperly subjective in discussing past eras. In contrast with this view, the modernity of Enlightenment historiography is emphasized.

 

February 2019: Nathaniel Wolloch is an Israeli independent scholar. He is an intellectual historian of the long 18th century, and the author of numerous articles and three books, Subjugated Animals: Animals and Anthropocentrism in Early Modern European Culture (2006); History and Nature in the Enlightenment: Praise of the Mastery of Nature in Eighteenth-Century Historical Literature (2011); and Nature in the History of Economic Thought: How Natural Resources Became an Economic Concept (2017).

 

Mildorf, Jarmila . 2019. Autobiography, the Literary, and the Everyday in Paul Auster’s Report from the Interior. Partial Answers 17(1): 125-140. . Publisher's Version

This article explores the idea that autobiographical texts can also become sites of withdrawal, where the seemingly personal is offered on the surface of the text but also immediately recedes into the background. Paul Auster’s autobiographical text Report from the Interior, which is a companion piece to the earlier Winter Journal, is a case in point. In this text, the literary and the everyday intersect in intriguing ways. The book features lengthy descriptions of (pop)cultural artefacts which influenced the young Auster’s mind. Auster further contextualizes his life by referring to historical moments and political issues. I argue that readers’ expectations of an introspective stance and a personal and idiosyncratic view of the author’s (special) life are thwarted to a degree since the Report in fact “exteriorizes” Auster’s inner life through the use of the everyday and thus turns it into a common experience that other people growing up under similar circumstances in the 1950s may recognize and identify with. His use of you-narration as a means of self-address can be interpreted as either a means of self-distancing or of creating a sense of intimacy. It thus also serves as a projection screen for readers’ own memories of the past and of life experiences they may have shared with Auster.

 

 

February 2019: Jarmila Mildorf received her PhD in sociolinguistics from the University of Aberdeen (Scotland) and is now a Senior Lecturer of English language and literature at the University of Paderborn (Germany). She is the author of Storying Domestic Violence (2007) and has co-edited six collections of essays: Imaginary Dialogues in English: Explorations of a Literary Form (2012), The Writing Cure: Literature and Medicine in Context (2013), Magic, Science, Technology, and Literature (2nd ed. 2014), Imaginary Dialogues in American Literature and Philosophy (2014), Audionarratology: Interfaces of Sound and Narrative (2016) and Dialogue across Media (2016). She was also a guest co-editor of a special issue on Narrative: Knowing, Living, Telling (Partial Answers 6.2). Her research interests are dialogue studies, conversational storytelling, second-person narration, the medical humanities, and radio drama.

 

jarmila_mildorf.jpg
Toikkanen, Jarkko . 2019. Intermedial Experience and Ekphrasis in Wordsworth’s 'Slumber'. Partial Answers 17(1): 107-124. . Publisher's Version

Comments on William Wordsworth’s much-debated poem “A slumber did my spirit seal” (1800) fall into two interpretive positions: “shock” readings and “non-shock” readings. The poem can be understood in a new way through the concept of intermedial experience and the rhetorical device of ekphrasis. I call for a kind of visual reading that does not let the intermedial experience of poetry be reduced to an interpretive position, as there always remains an excess of experience, something that is not part of the interpretation and cannot be exhausted by offering another interpretation. Becoming involved with the excess and reflecting on it can yield insight into how intermedial experience is constituted. In the readings of “Slumber,” it has consistently been the empty space between the poem’s two stanzas that has appeared to generate such excess. I discuss the images readers have seen in reading the poem, the narrative they have used to describe them in their own words, as well as the effect of the empty space on their responses. Who is the source of the significance of the poem’s visual images, the reader, the poetic I, or Wordsworth himself, and what does the reading come to in terms of the selves involved? I argue that interpretive positions such as the “shock” and “non-shock” readings of “Slumber” can be viewed as ekphrases in which the reader verbally describes the images of the poem with the consequence of narrative appropriation. In doing so, the intermedial experience of poetry is reduced to an interpretive position, and the reading process subjectively closed off into a private sphere. Studying the device of ekphrasis shows how reading, understood as intermedial experience affected by empty space in “Slumber,” both maintains and disrupts this sense of subjective closure.

 

Jarkko Toikkanen (PhD, docent) currently works as university researcher at the University of Tampere for the Academy of Finland consortium “The Literary in Life” in which he heads the work package “Intermedial Experience and Affectivity.” Toikkanen has been developing the concept of experience within the field of intermediality research in literary studies for nearly a decade now. His main objective has been to study how reading literature is experienced in terms of the visual or auditory images that literature makes the reader imagine seeing or hearing. Methodologically, he has applied specific rhetorical devices (ekphrasis and hypotyposis) through which images that demand interpretation can be distinguished from images that appear simply to be seen or heard.

 

Jin, Hengshan . 2019. The Meaning of Liberation: From The Joy Luck Club to Face and Saving Face. Partial Answers 17(1): 65-80. . Publisher's Version

The film The Joy Luck Club (1993) adapted from Amy Tan’s novel of the same title is considered a classic in the representation of Chinese Americans, especially Chinese American women in the past few decades. In many ways, two other films, Face (2002) and Saving Face (2004), share a similar theme with The Joy Luck Club, in terms of the conflict between mothers and daughters as well as between Chinese culture and American culture. The conflicts are eventually resolved to some degree, to everyone’s satisfaction, to the satisfaction of the Chinese audience in particular. It is important, however, to see the films as a window to American life and society: the theme of liberation presented in the films is to be understood in the context of American topoi, namely, the pursuit of the self and the search for the value of life in a multicultural society. To a large extent, the three films address the American audience rather than the Chinese audience. While they tend towards the promotion of the social status of the Chinese community in America and engage in the representation of the different Chinese cultural features, the films endow the contemporary Chinese Americans with a prominent national identity that is American rather than Chinese.

 

 

February 2019: Hengshan Jin is professor of English and American Studies at the School of Foreign Languages in East China Normal University. He obtained his Ph.D from Peking University in 2004. He is the author of John Updike and Contemporary American Society (2008) and The Rooted Print: The Cold War Mentality and American Literature and Culture (2017). He has also published more than 40 academic articles covering a diverse range of American literature, culture as well as contemporary Chinese literature. He was a Fulbright visiting scholar at Duke University from 2010-2011.

jin_hengshan.jpg
Keskinen, Mikko . 2019. Narrating Selves amid Library Shelves: Literary Mediation and Demediation in S. by J.J. Abrams and Doug Dorst. Partial Answers 17(1): 141-158. . Publisher's Version

This essay focuses on the various forms of narrating, mediating, and interpreting selves within and around a book object, the novel S. (2013) by J. J. Abrams and Doug Dorst. The novel S. is an experiment in producing a deceivingly realistic replica of a maltreated library book object, but its discursive practices also rely on familiar literary forms, harking back to epistolary commonplaces, as well as to marginalia, both ancient and modern. The book object S., which carries the text of the novel-within-a-novel, the readers’ multilayered markings, and paraphernalia, forms an archive dramatizing the workings of memory, thought, and emotion. That archive also demonstrates how the characters collect, organize, and process data from a variety of media sources. S. also problematizes narration, mediation, and the representation of textual selves through its data overkill verging on unreadability. Modifying Garrett Stewart’s notion, the essay considers the possible significances of narrative “demediation” in experiments with the nearly dysfunctional book form. The very act of demediating signifies conceptually, by its very presence, as conceptual art customarily does. In the case of S., it conceptualizes textual communication and minds in interaction even to a degree of confusion, not-reading, or veritable library silence in reception.

 

February 2019: Mikko Keskinen is Professor of Comparative Literature at the University of Jyväskylä, Finland. He is the author of Response, Resistance, Deconstruction (Jyväskylä UP, 1998) and Audio Book: Essays on Sound Technologies in Narrative Fiction (Lexington Books, 2008). He has published articles on narrative theory, contemporary literature, and experimental writing in Critique, Journal of International Women’s Studies, PsyArt, Romanic Review, Imaginaires, Image [&] Narrative, and Frontiers of Narrative Studies. His book chapters have appeared or are forthcoming in Novels of the Contemporary Extreme (Continuum, 2006), Terrorism, Media, and the Ethics of Fiction (Continuum, 2010), Theory of Mind and Literature (Purdue UP, 2010), and Reconfiguring the Non-Human (Routledge, 2019).

 

Andersson, Greger . 2019. Narrating Selves and the Literary in the Bible. Partial Answers 17(1): 87-105. . Publisher's Version

This article discusses how features in a narrative generate an understanding of its purpose and how this understanding affects our attitude when reading and interpreting a text. It focusses on biblical texts that aspire to be historical but still contain elements that are generally thought to belong to the realm of fiction, as well as on texts with an assumed argumentative purpose and traits that create a sense of literary art. The four texts are Jesus’s parable of the Good Samaritan, the book of Nehemiah, autobiographical sections in Paul, and third-person narratives in the books of Samuel. The article suggests that our understanding of the frame determines the function and meaning of the forms; yet it also argues that the presence of certain forms might challenge conventional assumptions about the frame, that is, the purpose of some narratives.

 

February 2019:

Greger Andersson is Professor in Comparative Literature and head of the research environment Narration, Life, Meaning at Örebro University, Sweden. He has published on narratology and the application of narratology as an analytical method in biblical studies. At present he is working with the theme of sameness or difference in narratology.

 

Hyvaerinen, Matti, Mari Hatavara, and Jarmila Mildorf. 2019. NARRATING SELVES FROM THE BIBLE TO SOCIAL MEDIA: INTRODUCTION TO THE FORUM. Partial Answers 17(1): 81-86. . Publisher's Version

 

 

This introduction to the forum “Narrating Selves from the Bible to Social Media” contextualizes the theme by taking recourse to philosopher Alasdair MacIntyre’s reflections on self-narration. MacIntyre poses the question about personal continuity in spite of the necessary change. With his concept of “character,” he makes explicit the connection to literature, thus emphasizing a degree of creativity when people tell their life stories. The contributions to the forum explore this aspect by also highlighting the role of the everyday and the media through which selves are portrayed.

 

Gomel, Elana . 2019. Existential Threats: American Apocalyptic Beliefs in the Technological Age, by Lisa Vox. Partial Answers 17(1): 190-193. . Publisher's VersionAbstract
Book Review
Chertoff, Daniel S. . 2019. The Cambridge Introduction to Postmodernism, by Brian McHale. Partial Answers 17(1): 186-189. . Publisher's VersionAbstract
Book Review
Mascetti, Yaakov A. . 2019. The Labor of the Mind: Intellect and Gender in Enlightenment Cultures, by Anthony J. La Vopa, and Anna Seward's Journal and Sermons, ed. Teresa Barnard. Partial Answers 17(1): 183-186. . Publisher's VersionAbstract
Book Review
Chorell, Torbjörn Gustafsson . 2019. Fascination in Julio Cortázar’s 'Axolotl'. Partial Answers 17(1): 49-63. . Publisher's Version

 

Julio Cortázar’s short story “Axolotl” is a literary analysis of fascination. Situating the story in the history of fascination, the article highlights how it repeats well-known themes from this history. Cortázar’s short story also shows how authors have been able to use fascination as a productive force. I argue that Cortázar’s fascination is intimately connected to temporality, especially the time structure associated with reminders. As such, the fascinating story of a man’s obsession with an axolotl suggests that fascination became a major aspect of cultural reproduction and reconfiguration during the 20th century.

 

 

 

February 2019:

Torbjörn Gustafsson Chorell is professor specializing in intellectual history, including historical theory, at the Department of History of Science and Ideas, Uppsala University (Sweden). He currently works on the history of fascination and the impact of theories of secularization in modern historiography.

 

Mäkelä, Maria . 2019. Literary Facebook Narratology: Experientiality, Simultaneity, Tellability. Partial Answers 17(1): 159-182. . Publisher's Version

 

The article presents a new method for the analysis of short-form on-line storytelling by assuming an aestheticizing point of view on an everyday narrative practice. It examines the expressive affordances of Facebook status updates with the help of three prominent concepts derived from literary narratology and sociolinguistics: experientiality, simultaneity, and tellability. Conventions of the novel such as the epistolary form are juxtaposed with social media narration, in order to highlight both the intentional artistry and accidental aesthetics of status updates. The article supplements sociolinguistic studies by exposing the existentialist, self-consciously non-communicative facet of Facebook storytelling.

 

 

Maria Mäkelä is Senior Lecturer in Comparative Literature and Director of Narrare: Centre for Interdisciplinary Narrative Studies at the University of Tampere, Finland. Currently she is running two research projects, Dangers of Narrative (2017–2020) and the research consortium Instrumental Narratives (2018–2022). In 2018, she is Vice-President of the International Society for the Study of Narrative and Visiting Professor at the Centre for Fictionality Studies, Aarhus University. She is co-editor of Narrative, Interrupted (De Gruyter, 2012) and Narrative Theory, Literature, and New Media (Routledge, 2015). She has published on consciousness, voice, and realism across media, the literary tradition of adultery, authorial ethos, and critical applications of postclassical narratologies.

updated on September 26, 2018

 

Kosc, Grzegorz . 2019. Robert Frost’s Traitors and His Poetics of Disloyalty. Partial Answers 17(1): 23-47. . Publisher's Version

Due to the popular misperception of Robert Frost (1874–1963) as a “court” or “presidential” poet, critics have largely failed to acknowledge his lifelong preoccupation with the notion of treason as sometimes a commendable act. As a result, we do not understand adequately the intellectual roots of his ambivalent adherence to the poetic form and of his special kind of irony.

By analyzing his numerous remarks on treason and some of the many books he read on political traitors, one can develop a whole typology of loyalists and renegades crowding his imagination. These types mark out Frost’s field of reflection on the question of excessive belonging to both the state and the poem. The essay reconstructs the poet’s understanding of the political and psychological profiles of Aaron Burr, Robert E. Lee, Ulysses S. Grant, Benedict Arnold, and Shakespeare’s Brutus. If Frost was disgusted with the shallowness of Burr and the overly rigid loyalism of Lee, he was also entirely taken with the various modes of disloyalty or betrayal exemplified by the other three figures. These five profiles shed light on some of the more difficult motifs of his imagination and, most importantly, on his tonal reserve, as is shown on the example of his poem “The Pasture.”

 

Grzegorz Kosc is Associate professor of American studies at the American Studies Center of the University of Warsaw. He is the author of two books Robert Lowell: Uncomfortable Epigone of the Grands Maîtres (2005) and Robert Frost's Political Body (2014). Recently, his articles have appeared in Wallace Stevens Journal and Papers on Language and Literature. He is co-editing, with Steven Gould Axelrod of the University of California, Riverside, a new edition of Robert Lowell’s prose for Farrar, Straus and Giroux.